Watchmen (Alan Moore, Dave Gibbons)

Watchmen is – as probably everybody who ever knew a geek knows by now – a graphic novel by Alan Moore (writing) and Dave Gibbons (illustrating) (and was recently adapted into a movie, review follows tomorrow).

In a parallel world, it’s 1985 and Nixon is still president of the United States. In the 40s, actual masked vigilantes appeared, which led to a ban in the 70s. Now, most of the vigilantes are retired. The story follows several of these more or less retired figures, namely Nite Owl, Silk Spectre, Rorschach, Dr. Manhattan, Ozymandias, The Comedian.
The Comedian is murdered and Rorschach, the only vigilante left, who is not retired and doesn’t work for the government is convinced that someone is killing off their old group. His investigations lead him deeper and deeper into the problematic world of the “superheroes”.

This comic is considered a mile stone in the history of this art form, and rightly so. Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons show the possibilities graphic novels have (and novels or movies don’t) and at the same time tell a fascinating and thoughtful story about ethics and morale, without ever becoming moralistic themselves. Unfortunately, the ending was a bit incongruous with the rest of the graphic novel.



The book wasn’t without fault. But these faults seem dwarfish next to what it accomplishes. And all this is due to the great story by Alan Moore. It’s exciting and you want to know what’s happening next, but at the same time it doesn’t stop to ask you uncomfortable questions about authority and ethics and politics.

What I thought a weak point, though, was the ending. Not the dilemma itself, which is genius, but the alien dumped in the middle of New York. That kind of came from nowhere. Suddenly there are psychic brains? Why was that never even hinted at before? While I did enjoy the hints towards the missing writer etc., I thought the rest of that subplot just didn’t fit with the rest of the story. It seemed not as thought through as the rest.

Apart from that, I immensly enjoyed the story, though, and the characters. Nite Owl (I)’s death had me in tears, but I honestly cared about all the characters and reacted to all of them. There wasn’t one of the vigilantes that left me cold, even if my reactions to each of them were different – from horror to sadness to genuine affection.

watchmen_1_1The first page of the comic.

I loved all the details – the recurring smiley, the clocks, the repeating pictures, the mirroring of the story through the parallel pirate Black Freighter comic etc etc. Also the backstories, provided by the additional material were great.

But the best part about it, in my opinion, was the narrative structure, the time jumps and backflashes, especially when it comes to Dr. Manhattan’s story. His exile on Mars/his lifestory was pure genius.

watchmen1mediumFavourite part.

But my major point of criticism, artistically, has to be John Higgins‘ colouring, which is distracting at best, totally off at worst. That The Comedian’s scar is in one place and the red taint in another, is only distracting. That whole panels get coloured in purple light where there should be no purple light is unnerving. And the yellow-red-green of the bodies in the Black Freighter story left me scratching my head.

You can say a lot about the Watchmen, and it’s definitely a novel that invites you to discuss it. This is part of what makes it so great, but it’s also the part I’ll leave to other people. Personally, I don’t feel fit (yet, at least) to provide you with a complete theory of what the book wants to say. But here are some further links of people who started just that discussion.

Tor’s Steven Padnick on the politics of Watchmen.
Overthinking It on the politics of Watchmen.

If nothing else, it’s fascinating reading material. Both the articles and the graphic novel.

Question for you people, who have read this graphic novel as well. According to imdb, it is hinted at that Ozymandias and Rorschach are gay. Did you see that? If yes, where? Because I so totally didn’t. I know about Captain Metropolis and Hooded Justice (that was pretty explicit), but Ozymandias and Rorschach? Really?

17 thoughts on “Watchmen (Alan Moore, Dave Gibbons)

  1. I thought it’s just that Rorschach THINKS Ozymandias is gay, although I don’t really remember where I got that from, either. Could be wrong. Rorschach seems a little old school to be gay, although that’s probably a prejudiced statement. He’s more like sexually repressed, which I suppose is reasonable enough after walking in on your mother with a “customer”.

    I”m rereading it now, actually. It’ll be a while before the movie comes here(and I don’t want to download it), but I thought I’d get ready for it. :)

  2. I mean, I have to admit that Ozymandias kind of gives off a gay vibe. But it wasn’t actually hinted at, in more explicit terms than “he wears a purple cape”, was it?

    I agree with you that Rorschach is sexually repressed. In what direction his sexuality would go, if it wasn’t repressed, I don’t really know. But I thought he had a bit of a crush on Silk Spectre (the way he talks to her, it’s different. But maybe that’s just because she’s a woman. Then again, he doesn’t talk to his landlady like this…).

    Re-reading is a good idea, I think. Always prepared, right? ;)

  3. Yeah, it never occurred to me, either. If it wasn’t one of the trivia bits on the imdb, I would have gone with metro- but heterosexual for Ozymandias and too broken to really give a shit for Rorschach.

    Well. The imdb isn’t all knowing, apparently. What a disappointment. :)

  4. Pingback: Watchmen (2009) « Stuff

  5. @prestidigitator & @kalafudra: Rorschach is a sketchy source about a man’s sexuality. His note in the journal about seeing N’owl and S’Specter, and speculation of an affair between them does have an under-current of disgust. Nay?

    Also, Ozymandias does have an attractive female secretary by his side. Maybe little Rorshy has a crush on him?

  6. Well, my theory is still that Rorschach has a crush on Silk Spectre and not on Ozymandias. But I can’t say I want to really peek inside Rorschach’s head to find out.

    But you’re right. I wouldn’t take him as a very reliable source about anybody’s sexuality. :)

  7. There are two main hints that Rorschach is gay – one is the Nostalgia cologne, the other is his reaction to Nite Owl when Dan gives his mini-rant, “Don’t you know how hard it is to be your friend?!”

    When Rorschach is captured by the police, one of the officers yells out, “Boy, he stinks. What is that, aftershave?”
    The police report includes a broken bottle of “Nostalgia” cologne, presumably broken during Rorschach’s leap leap from the second-story window.
    When Dan has a flashback in issue 7, of Rorschach explaining the Mask-Killer theory, Dan’s mental image includes Rorschach applying cologne from a bottle of Nostalgia.
    The Nostalgia cologne, Adrian Veidt writes in his inter-office memo, is marketed with an eye to homo-sexuals by using slightly androgynous female models to advertise it…

    The final, most obvious hint is in Issue Ten, when Rorschach and Nite Owl are sitting in Nite Owl’s airship, hiding under-water, waiting to go and beat answers from New York’s underworld. Rorschach critizes Nite Owl, saying they’re wasting time “lazing” about when they should be hunting for answers, and Nite Owl explodes, saying it’s very, very hard being Rorschach’s friend, because of all his anti-social tendencies.
    Rorschach apologises, saying that Dan is a very good friend, and the two shake hands… But Dan has to force Rorschach to let his hand go, after.

    Rorschach had a crush on Nite Owl, methinks.
    Me also spends way too much time on this. Off to get a life, now.

  8. “Suddenly there are psychic brains? Why was that never even hinted at before?”

    It actually was. The issue of the New Frontiersman at the end of chapter eight briefly mentions “so-called psychic and clairvoyant Robert Deschaines” whose head was stolen after he died of a stroke. It was Deschaines’ brain that was cloned to make the squid.

  9. Pingback: The Trollenberg Terror (1958) « Stuff

  10. Pingback: Captain America: Civil War (2016) | kalafudra's Stuff

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.