After Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, now Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters.

Short Story: Let Us Now Praise Awesome Dinosaurs.

Words we love, words we hate.


Joss Whedon gets slashy in Buffy Comic.


Natalie Portman cast in Thor.

David Tennant as Bilbo Baggins? On the one hand: coolcoolcoolcool. On the other hand: isn’t he a tad too thin?

First Pictures of Iron Man 2.

Johnny Depp as Carol Channing? Sounds awesome, unfortunately, it doesn’t seem to be happening (yet?).

Top 10 Impossibe Spaces (Bigger on the Inside).


THANK GOODNESS! Vatican gives Harry Potter VI the thumbs up. And Oscar Wilde, too.


72-year long study about what makes us happy. [Or at least, what makes white middle/upper class men happy.]


List of Emmy Nominations is out.

Completely Different Things

Hello Kitty Hell.

Post-it Invaders.

John Barrowman in drag. Nice…

Warning Signs of the times.

movies_for_ladies[taken from here]

This is beautiful and awesome.

[via liberrydwarf] Guidelines for Vampires.


  1. unfassbar wieviele emmy kategorien es gibt.
    fuer mich ist klar: flight of the conchords muss und wird gewinnen! und jemaine clement, der traummann schlechthin. hach.

    ansonsten sollte betty white gewinnen, wo betty white nominiert ist, aber auch da, wo betty white nicht nominiert ist, sollte betty white gewinnen. jupp.

    • Die vielen Kategorien sind auf jeden Fall sinnvoller als die 10 Bester Film Nominierungen von den Oscars…

      Betty White is super! Bin voll deiner Meinung.

      Und Flight of the Conchords! Yes, yes!

  2. @ Grant study/ What makes us happy:

    I haven’t finished it yet, but it is …. fascinating. It really is.
    I just found out that I am a master of the fourth/best kind of adaptions. :P

    I also came to think that Peter Hoeg has read the study before writing I”Perceptions on the 20th century”.

    Thanks for linking to that. I’ll find some way to put it in my thesis.

    • Glad I could inspire. It really is a very interesting study, no doubt about it.

      I think what makes a good author like Peter Hoeg so good is that he intuitively gets what these studies prove – he doesn’t need to have read it, it just confirms his view of the world.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.