Klimt (2006)

Klimt is Raoul Ruiz‘ kinda-biopic of Gustav Klimt, starring John Malkovich, Veronica Ferres, Stephen Dillane, Saffron Burrows and Nikolai Kinski.

Plot:
Gustav Klimt (John Malkovich) is dying. He gets a visit from Egon Schiele (Nikolai Kinski) and together they delve into Klimt’s feverish subconscious to explore his life, his work and his relationships.

Holy bloody shit, this movie is a mess. The concept might – might – have worked, if the movie wasn’t so damn conscious [and kinda smugly self-congratulatory] about every little thing it did. Also, it was a bit ridiculous.

There are a few things about this film I didn’t understand. Why they chose to do it in English but cast a lot of Austrian actors [Georg Friedrich among them, which is great. He even got to say a line! :)] which meant that half of the dialogues were spoken in grating Austrian-accented English, for example. Or why they thought that it would be a great idea to make a movie that only makes sense to Klimt scholars [which I am not].

Other things were just plain bad: John Malkovich plays Klimt like he was a robot (what happened there, I wonder?) and the script was really badly written (which might be to do with the translating it back and forth that apparently happened in the process) but you knew that everybody involved thought that they were extremely clever which is a deadly combination. [The name-dropping alone usually happened in a really intrusive manner.]

Generally the movie was much too conscious of itself. With almost every line you felt Raoul Ruiz was mouthing the words along and patting his own back at how brilliant he is and telling you “did you see what I did there? Did you see how fantastic I am?” [Which is also exactly the way Nikolai Kinski played Schiele – he looks the part, but you really can’t get any more “look I’m acting, look what I’m doing with my hands, look how crazy I can be, can you tell I’m acting yet”-y.]

I’m sure that if he ever read this review, Ruiz would be scoffing at my totally not understanding the movie at all and that I just don’t get the art. And he’d probably be right. But that doesn’t make this movie any better.

Summarising: skip it. Skip it hard. Unless you’re the world’s biggest Klimt fan.

8 thoughts on “Klimt (2006)

  1. sounds like Kinski was trying to channel his father ^^

    And – I haven’t seen the film and I won’t ever see the film – I’m guessing this one would have been 300% more awesome if he had succeeded.

  2. Hm. I think I’d actually watch Robo-Klimt in conversation with a youthful Kinski in full Edgar Wallace-mode. They could start with a nice chat and then have a deathmatch in the drawing room ^^

    On a completely different note – the tech-support guy in my computer course looks like a badly-dressed Justin Hammer lookalike. (Yes, we needed the tech-support guy 12 mins into the first lesson.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.