10 Cloverfield Lane (2016)

10 Cloverfield Lane
Director: Dan Trachtenberg
Writer: Josh Campbell, Matthew Stuecken, Damien Chazelle
Prequel to: [very kinda] Cloverfield
Cast: Mary Elizabeth Winstead, John Goodman, John Gallagher Jr., Bradley Cooper [as a voice cameo]
Seen on: 9.4.2016

Plot:
Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) gets into a car accident. When she wakes up, she finds herself chained and locked in a room in a bunker. As he frees her Howard (John Goodman) explains to her that he found her and brought her to his bunker because something has happened outside that makes the very air poisonous. With them in the bunker is Emmett (John Gallagher Jr.) who confirms Howard’s story and says that he fought his way into the bunker to get away from the outside. Michelle is suspicious though and plots her escape.

10 Cloverfield Lane was a thoroughly entertaining, tense film with a great cast. While it did stumble here and there, altogether it raced through its story and dragged the audience right along with it.

10cloverfieldlane

[SPOILERS]

I watched Cloverfield (at a time where I didn’t yet review everything so there’s no review to link to) and I wasn’t particularly taken with it. The fact that 10 Cloverfield Lane was belatedly constructed as a prequel to it was therefore not really a point of attraction to me. Be that as it may, 10 Cloverfield Lane can stand on its own and for me, it stands better than Cloverfield did anyway.

What I loved most of all was the fact that there actually is a danger outside and we get to know that pretty quickly. While the film plays with the expectation that, really, there is nothing out there, it’s just a trick, it doesn’t go with that explanation – which would have felt a little tired to me. Nor does it keep you in the dark as long as it can, to make a final gasping reveal in the last seconds of the film. None of that. But the fact that there is something on the outside doesn’t automatically mean that Howard was straightforward about everything else or that he doesn’t have a hidden agenda. And then it really becomes a question of risk calculation: where does Michelle think the danger is bigger?

Trachtenberg has a good handle on the film and there are only occasional slip-ups in pacing and story. Why Michelle was tied up in the beginning of the film was never convincingly explained, the way that Emmett is disposed of was way too obvious and the old trope of the bad guy always coming back once more when you don’t expect it anymore (except you do) should have stayed home. But these things come and go pretty fast in an otherwise gripping and well-paced film that manages to keep up the tension through most of its parts.

That this works out so well is also due to the great performances, particularly by John Goodman and Mary Elizabeth Winstead. The movie focus very much on them and they nicely play off each other, showing more versatility than we’re used to getting from either, providing much of the entertainment the film provides.

10cloverfieldlane2Summarizing: Highly enjoyable.

3 comments

  1. I barely remember Cloverfield, but I found that one interesting and therefore decided to watch it nonetheless. The concept of knowing there truly was something outside felt intriguing to me and I was quite looking forward to watching it.

    Highly enjoyable is absolutely the write wording, I almost didn’t make it to catch it on the big screen, and I am happy I did. John Goodman was absolutely amazing, depply impressed. I wouldn’t have minded if the ending had been a bit different in regard to how much is shown, but I also wondered if it might have been the same in Cloverfield and I just didn’t remember (I am not wondering enough to re-watch though!).

    • No, I’m not considering a re-watch of Cloverfield either just so that I can review it (which would be my only motivation). Oh well. Let’s just stay with the sequel. ;)

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.